Free sample · for illustration

This is the full shape of a Meg discovery report — opportunity map, tools, 4-day plan, hours-saved math, and a Claude Project. Yours is built from your 20-minute call with Meg.

AI Strategy Report
May 12, 2026Sample

Lighthouse Studio

Lighthouse Studio is a 38-person digital agency with six service pods (brand, web, paid media, content, SEO, analytics), about $6M in annual revenue, and a roughly 60/40 mix of retainer and project work. The biggest single source of senior-team friction is the front-of-funnel pipeline: turning discovery calls into proposals, and turning live work into weekly client status updates.

Three workflows account for the majority of recoverable hours: proposal-to-brief assembly, weekly client status digests, and the content QA pass before drafts go to clients. Off-the-shelf AI tools — Claude Teams, Notion AI, Granola, Make.com — can take roughly 60% of the rote work off your senior strategists inside week one, without replacing the judgment work that actually wins business.

The 4-day plan below starts with the single highest-leverage workflow (proposal-to-brief) and then deploys the status-digest automation in parallel. Conservatively that recovers 14–22 hours of senior time per week across the leadership team — roughly $52K–$84K of recovered capacity per year — which Lighthouse can either reinvest in new business or convert directly to margin.

Lighthouse Studio is fictional. Names, numbers, and tool recommendations are illustrative — yours will reference your business, your tools, and your numbers.

5 surfaced

Opportunities

Effort × impact

Top-left is the highest leverage. Numbers refer to the list below.

AutomationContentSalesOperationsFinance
  1. 01

    Proposal-to-brief assembly from discovery transcripts

    effort 2/5 · impact 5/5 · automation

    Right now every new proposal eats 6–10 hours of senior strategist time, most of it spent re-reading discovery notes and re-typing context Lighthouse already captured on the call. A Claude Project loaded with the agency's voice, pricing tiers, and past wins can produce a first-pass brief from a Fireflies transcript in under five minutes. Senior staff still edits — but they start from 80%, not from scratch.

  2. 02

    Weekly client status digests, generated from Slack and HubSpot

    effort 2/5 · impact 4/5 · content

    Account managers currently spend 4–6 hours a week assembling status updates by clicking through Slack threads, HubSpot deals, and shared docs. A Make.com flow can pull this week's activity into Claude, which writes a one-page digest in your house voice. Your AM reviews and ships — the writing time goes from hours to minutes per client.

  3. 03

    Inbound lead triage and routing

    effort 1/5 · impact 3/5 · sales

    About a third of inbound leads on the contact form are out-of-ICP (wrong size, wrong stage, wrong industry) but still get a senior strategist's first response. A simple Claude prompt graded against your ideal-customer profile can route in-ICP leads straight to the strategist and send a tactful decline-with-referral to the rest — recovering ~3 hours of senior time per week with no quality loss.

  4. 04

    Pre-review pass on outbound content drafts

    effort 3/5 · impact 4/5 · operations

    Senior creatives currently do two passes on every content draft: a heavy structural pass and a light line-edit pass. The line-edit pass — checking voice, grammar, fact-density, internal-link coverage — is exactly the kind of work Claude does well. Wired into the Notion content database, it cuts second-pass time roughly in half across the content pod.

  5. 05

    Retainer reconciliation memos

    effort 4/5 · impact 3/5 · finance

    Every quarter, your ops lead writes a 1–2 page memo per retainer client reconciling hours promised vs. delivered and recommending scope changes. The data lives in Harvest and HubSpot. A Claude prompt that ingests both and writes a first draft turns a half-week project into a half-day review.

Off-the-shelf, real prices

Recommended tools

ToolWhat it does for youCostSetup
Claude TeamsThe workhorse for proposal drafting, status digests, and content QA. Set up one shared Project per workflow.$30/user/mohours
Notion AIAlready where Lighthouse stores discovery notes and briefs — Notion AI plus Claude keeps everything in one workspace.$20/user/mominutes
Fireflies.aiTranscribes every discovery and client call so the proposal generator has source material to work from.$18/user/mominutes
GranolaLightweight meeting-note app that captures action items in the format Make.com can route into Asana.$14/user/mominutes
Make.comGlue layer between Slack, HubSpot, Notion, and Claude — runs the status-digest and lead-triage flows.$11-29/modays
Loom AIReplaces 2 of every 3 internal status meetings with a 3-minute Loom plus an AI-generated written summary.$15/user/mominutes
What to do this week

4-day quick-win plan

  1. Day 1

    Stand up the proposal-to-brief workflow

    • Create a Notion database called Discovery → Brief and add views for In-progress, Drafted, Sent.
    • Install Claude Teams for 4 senior staff and create a shared Project named Lighthouse Proposals.
    • Capture the last 3 discovery-call transcripts from Fireflies and paste them into the new database.
  2. Day 2

    Build and pressure-test the proposal generator

    • Write the Project system prompt: Lighthouse's voice, your three pricing tiers, and the structure your senior strategists already use.
    • Run the prompt against two historic discovery transcripts and diff the output against the proposal you actually shipped.
    • Refine the prompt until output passes a senior-strategist eye in under 15 minutes of editing.
  3. Day 3

    Deploy the weekly client status digest

    • Configure a Make.com scenario: pull this week's HubSpot deal-stage changes and Slack #client-* threads into Claude.
    • Send the first generated digest to one friendly retainer client; ask for a 60-second reaction on tone and length.
    • Adjust the prompt and lock the template before the next Friday cadence.
  4. Day 4

    Measure, document, and pick what's next

    • Track hours saved on proposals and status reports this week against the prior 4-week baseline.
    • Record a 5-minute internal Loom: what worked, what didn't, what changes for next week.
    • Pick one service pod to pilot the content QA pre-review (recommended: paid media — fewer brand-voice landmines).
Grounded estimate

Financial impact

Re-run the math with your numbers

Hours saved / year

864 hrs

Estimated annual value

$64.8k

Shah's estimate: 14-22 hours saved per week, $52,000-$84,000 annual value. Adjust the inputs to see your own number.

Assumptions

  • Senior-team blended fully-loaded cost of $85/hour.
  • 48 working weeks per year, accounting for US holidays and seasonal slowdown.
  • Hours saved get redirected to senior-level work (new business, strategy) — not banked as a pure cost cut.
Avoiding the wrong move is half the value

What not to do

Two things Lighthouse looks ready for that would burn money or stall momentum. Shah flags these explicitly so the temptation to chase them doesn't survive the read.

  1. 01

    Don't try to replace senior strategists with a single prompt.

    The proposal generator works because senior strategists still edit the last 20% — that's the part clients are paying for. Teams that try to ship Claude output unedited end up with proposals that read fine and convert poorly. Use the time saved on the first 80% to push harder on the last 20%, not to remove it.

  2. 02

    Don't roll out across all six pods in week one.

    The biggest failure mode in agencies this size is launching AI tooling in every pod simultaneously, then having no one to debug the messy cases. Get one workflow (proposal-to-brief) working end-to-end in one pod, prove the hours saved, and use that result to fund the next rollout. Two pods in month two, three in month three.

Bring Meg home

Your Claude Project

Pre-loaded with this business's context, the report's top opportunities, and 10 starter prompts written specifically for Lighthouse Studio. Try the copy buttons — they really do copy. In your own report, every prompt references your tools, your clients, and your workflows.

  1. 01

    Open claude.ai/projects and create a new Project. Name it “Lighthouse Studio”.

  2. 02

    Open Project instructions and paste the system prompt below.

  3. 03

    Start a new chat in the Project and try one of the starter prompts. The Project remembers your business across every chat.

System prompt — paste into Project instructions

You are an assistant for Lighthouse Studio, a 38-person digital agency in Brooklyn. Lighthouse runs six service pods — brand strategy, web development, paid media, content, SEO, and analytics — and serves roughly 22 active retainer clients plus a steady stream of project work. The owner is direct, allergic to fluff, and prefers crisp bullets over paragraphs. Match that voice in every response.

Lighthouse's top three AI-leverage workflows right now are: (1) turning Fireflies discovery transcripts into first-draft proposals, (2) writing weekly client status digests from Slack and HubSpot activity, and (3) doing a line-edit QA pass on outbound content drafts before they reach a senior creative. When the owner or a senior strategist asks for help on one of these, work from concrete inputs — actual transcripts, actual deal stages, actual draft text — rather than generic templates.

When you draft client-facing copy (proposals, status digests, kickoff agendas), default to Lighthouse's tone: warm but expert, plain English, no agency jargon, no exclamation marks. Pricing tiers are Discovery ($15K), Retainer ($25K/mo), and Project ($50K+). Always name a specific next action at the end of any client-facing draft.

When you do internal work (briefs, QA passes, reconciliation memos), be willing to flag things the senior team should think harder about — gaps in the input, weak claims, scope creep — rather than papering over them. Lighthouse uses you to accelerate the obvious work so senior judgment can go to the non-obvious work.

Starter prompts — copy any one and paste into a new Project chat

Draft a proposal from this discovery transcript

automation

I'm pasting in a Fireflies transcript from a discovery call. Draft a first-pass proposal in Lighthouse's structure: client context (2 paragraphs), recommended scope (bulleted), pricing tier and rationale, and next steps. Flag any places where the transcript didn't give us enough to commit.

Write this week's status digest for [Client]

content

Here are this week's HubSpot deal-stage changes and Slack #client-[name] threads. Write a one-page status digest in Lighthouse's voice: what shipped, what's in flight, what's blocked, and what we need from them. End with a specific ask.

Triage these inbound leads against our ICP

sales

Below are 10 inbound contact-form submissions. Lighthouse's ICP is: 50–500 employees, $5M–$50M revenue, US-based, B2B services or DTC, with an existing in-house marketing lead. For each lead, give a fit score (1-5), one-line reasoning, and either a routing decision (strategist, junior, decline-with-referral) or a clarifying question.

QA-pass this content draft before the senior review

operations

Here's a draft outbound article. Do a line-edit QA pass: voice and tone against Lighthouse's house style, factual claims that need a citation, missing internal links to our pillar pages, and one suggestion to strengthen the opening. Don't rewrite — annotate.

Summarize this month's campaign performance for [Client]

marketing

I'm pasting in this month's paid-media report (impressions, clicks, conversions, spend, CPA by channel). Write a client-facing 250-word summary: what we tested, what worked, what's next month's bet. Lead with the headline number; bury the caveats. Match Lighthouse's voice.

Draft a retainer reconciliation memo

finance

Here are this quarter's promised vs. delivered hours from Harvest for [Client], plus the deal scope from HubSpot. Draft a 1-page reconciliation memo: hours delta by service pod, the work we did instead, and a recommended scope-or-pricing adjustment for next quarter. Be direct.

Outline a content calendar from this strategy doc

content

Here's a brand strategy doc for [Client]. Outline a 12-week content calendar: 1 pillar piece per month, 2 supporting pieces per pillar, and weekly social hooks. For each item, name the keyword target, the funnel stage, and the asset format.

Rewrite this proposal section in Lighthouse's voice

marketing

The section below was drafted by a junior strategist. Rewrite it in Lighthouse's voice — direct, plain, no fluff — without changing the actual recommendation. Keep it under 200 words.

Draft a kickoff agenda for a new retainer

operations

We just signed [Client] for a [tier] retainer. Draft a 45-minute kickoff agenda: introductions (5 min), goals and success metrics (15 min), workstreams and owners (15 min), communications cadence (5 min), Q&A (5 min). Include the pre-read we should send 48 hours before.

Generate a follow-up email after a discovery call

sales

Here's a Fireflies transcript from a discovery call I just had. Draft a follow-up email: recap what we heard, name the two recommendations I committed to send by Friday, and propose a specific next-meeting time. Lighthouse voice — warm but expert, no exclamation marks.

Yours, built from a 20-minute call

This sample is generic on purpose. Yours won't be.

Lighthouse Studio is fictional. Your Meg report names your actual workflows, the tools you already pay for, the people on your team, and the numbers from your last quarter. Same shape — every recommendation pointed at your business.

Secure checkout via Square · Report in 1-2 business days

$1,000 · 20-minute call with Meg · Written report from Shah in 1–2 business days · How it works · Talk to Shah first