Live · 44 verified cases · Georgetown capstone

Measure your GenAI investment
with the rigor it deserves.

Most enterprises are pouring billions into GenAI; fewer than 30% report meaningful returns. RAPID diagnoses your maturity across five dimensions and benchmarks your profile against forty-four documented enterprise deployments.

Start the assessment See the evidenceFree · ~10 min · no signup
95%
of enterprise GenAI pilots fall short of their stated objectives.
MIT NANDA, 2025
82%
success rate when ≥4 of 5 adoption elements are present.
Georgetown synthesis
23%
success rate when 0–2 adoption elements are present.
Georgetown synthesis
44
verified enterprise deployments, 2018–2025, every claim sourced.
RAPID dataset
Benchmarked against research from
GartnerMcKinseyMIT NANDAStanford HAIHarvardNBERForresterBCGDeloittePwCEYBloomberg
01 / The framework

Five dimensions, every one with receipts.

Full source map
I · DeLone & McLean

Measurement Maturity

Whether outcomes are measured at the same rigor as engineering inputs. The largest dimension by case count — DeLone & McLean's six-factor IS success model adapted to GenAI deployment metrics.

16 anchor casesDeLone & McLean
Fig. 01 · Sample maturity profile73 Established
R · Readiness67A · Alignment73P · Portfolio58I · Impact83D · Diffusion50
02 / The dataset

Forty-four verified deployments. Every claim sourced.

Drawn from peer-reviewed journals, institutional research, regulatory findings, and corporate disclosures. 23 Tier 1 sources. 21 Tier 2. Spans cross-industry, financial services, retail, technology, telecom, healthcare, education.

Outcomes
31 success · 9 failure · 3 partial · 1 too early
Period
2018 – 2025
Top failure mode
Data quality / readiness gap
Browse the full table
Success70%
Failure20%
Partial7%
Too early2%
03 / Research findings

The numbers behind the framework.

95% of pilots fall short.

MIT's 2025 State of AI in Business reports that 95% of enterprise GenAI pilots miss their stated objectives. Adoption discipline, not model capability, is the gap.

MIT NANDA, 2025

Hiring screens: 2 of 2 failed.

Every documented enterprise hiring-screening deployment in the dataset was retracted or litigated. A 2024 academic audit found off-the-shelf LLMs preferred white-associated names 85% versus Black-associated 9%.

44-case dataset, 2018–2025

Adoption beats technology.

Organizations with four or more of the five adoption elements see an 82% success rate. Zero to two drops to 23%. Scope, sponsorship, and measurement outweigh model choice.

Georgetown synthesis (Gartner N=432, MIT 2025)

04 / Inside your assessment

Every score comes with evidence.

Use case risk profile
62–100%
use case range

Know the odds before you build.

Six GenAI use case types; each with a verified success rate. Decision Support clears every deployment in the dataset. Hiring-screening: four of four retracted or abandoned.

Adoption audit
82 ↔ 23%
by element count

Five elements that decide outcomes.

Objectives. Performance tracking. Change management. Iterative deployment. Named executive sponsor. Four-of-five flips outcomes by an order of magnitude.

Failure mode analysis
43%
cite data quality #1

Map your risk surface.

Six failure categories — data, technical, organizational, strategic, measurement, economic — scored from your dimension gaps and mapped to cautionary cases.

Industry ROI context
12
industries calibrated

Benchmarked against your cohort.

Projected ROI ranges by industry — Tech 18–24%, Financial Services 15–22%, Healthcare 12–18% — with size adjustments and per-dimension peer percentiles.

Executive report
6
board-ready pages

Six pages your CFO will read.

Cover, RAPID profile, dimension breakdown with percentiles, risk assessment, 30/60/90 roadmap, methodology appendix. Generated, not screenshotted.

Shareable output
75+
unlocks badge

Every completion is a LinkedIn post.

Dynamic OG card renders your score as a branded 1200×630 image. Pre-written copy drops into LinkedIn; Advanced scorers unlock a certification badge.

What you'll receive

A six-page executive PDF, generated to match.

  • Cover & profile. Executive summary with composite score and tier classification.
  • Dimension breakdown. Radar, percentile vs cohort, anchor cases per dimension.
  • Risk assessment. Six failure categories scored, mapped to cautionary deployments.
  • 30/60/90 roadmap. Prioritized actions tied to the dimensions you score lowest on.
  • Methodology appendix. Every claim cited; full source map and weighting rationale.
Generate yours Free · ~10 min
05 / How it works

From assessment to action.

01

Take the assessment

Fifteen Likert questions plus a five-element adoption audit, calibrated by industry, size, and use case.

02

Get your profile

Weighted RAPID score, radar chart, peer percentiles, and a deployment success probability drawn from 44 cases.

03

Share and act

Download the executive PDF, share a branded LinkedIn card, and follow the prioritized 30/60/90 roadmap.

Ready when you are

Measure your maturity.

Personalized RAPID profile, executive PDF, and shareable certification in under ten minutes. Free, no signup.